• Research Article
  • |
  • Open Access

Relationships between root secretion of organic acids and lead uptake and translocation in different rice cultivars

  • Jianguo Liu;
    • School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China
  • Yuankang Liu;
    • School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China
  • Kaiqiang Chu
    • School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China
  • Corresponding Author(s): Jianguo Liu

  • School of Environmental & Safety Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou, Jiangsu 213164, China

  • liujianguo@cczu.edu.cn

  • Liu J (2020).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Mar 30, 2020
Accepted : May 05, 2020
Published Online : May 07, 2020
Journal : Journal of Plant Biology and Crop Research
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Liu j, Liu Y, Chu K. Relationships between root secretion of organic acids and lead uptake and translocation in different rice cultivars. J Plant Biol Crop Res. 2020; 3(1): 1017.

Abstract

To investigate some mechanisms causing the variations among rice cultivars in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation, pot soil experiments were conducted with six rice cultivars under different soil Pb levels. Pb concentrations in rice plants and root secretions of low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) were measured. The results showed that the variations among the rice cultivars in grain Pb concentrations were 114.29% -- 146.93%. Grain Pb concentrations correlated positively and significantly (P <0.05 or 0.01) with shoot Pb concentrations and the translocation factors (TFs) of Pb from roots to shoots. The variations among the rice cultivars in LMWOAs contents in the soils were 20.62% -- 37.30%. There were positive and significant (P <0.05 or 0.01) correlations between LMWOAs contents in the soils and Pb concentrations in rice shoots and the grains, and TFs of Pb from the roots to the shoots. The correlations between soil LMWOAs contents and root Pb concentrations were positive but mostly insignificant (P > 0.05). The results suggest that soil LMWOAs could promote root Pb uptake, and in a larger extent, enhanced the translocation of Pb form root to shoot. The effects would further influence Pb transfer to and accumulation in rice grain. In conclusion, the variations among rice cultivars in root LMWOAs secretion ought to be one of the main mechanisms that differentiate rice cultivars in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in rice grain.

Keywords: Oryza sativa L; Lead; Uptake; Translocation; Organic acid

Introduction

      Heavy metal contamination affects soil quality and plant growth. The pollution in agricultural soil also leads to bioaccumulation of heavy metals in the food chain, which will pose serious hazards to the health of humans and animals [1,2].

      Lead (Pb) is a widespread and highly toxic metal pollutant, resulting from mining, disposal of wastewater and sewage sludge, road traffic, smelting activities, paints, etc [3,4]. Very high levels of Pb have been found in some agricultural soils in China. Pb concentration of 1486 mg kg-1 was reported in paddy field around a Pb/Zn mine in China. Pb concentrations as high as 419, 69.1, 13.2 and 4.67 mg kg-1 were found in rice root, straw, grain and brown rice respectively [5]. In Baoji of China, Pb concentrations even exceeded 25000 mg kg-1 in some urban soils [6].

      Pb is highly dangerous to human body, specifically at early stages of human life. Prenatal and early postnatal exposure to Pb at the level 10–20 mg dl-1 (in blood) will result in damage to central nervous systems. The damage was characterized by diminished intelligence, shortened attention span, and slowed reaction time. The effects are irreversible, untreatable and lifelong [7]. It was reported that heavy metal contamination (Cd and Pb) in food crops grown around mine posed a great health risk to the local population [8]. Therefore, to develop the technology for preventing or diminishing Pb absorption by crops and the further transport to edible organs has attracted wide concern. Various physical and chemical cleanup techniques are available at present, but most of them are costly, labor intensive and cause soil disturbances [9].

      The uptake of heavy metals by plant is mainly influenced by their bioavailability in the soils [10]. Though metal concentrations in some nature and contaminated soils are abundant, the bioavailability is often limited for some metals because of their low solubility in water and strong binding to soil particles. Metal mobility and plant availability in the rhizosphere are affected by rhizospheric environments and root exudates. Low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) secreted by plant roots can form metal-LMWOA complexes in the rhizosphere, which may increase metal bioavailability and enhance metal uptake by plant roots and the transfer to aerial parts [11,12].

      It was assumed that plant genotypes may play dominant role in the uptake and translocation of heavy metals by plants, and great genotypic differences have been reported [13-17]. Understanding the genetic mechanism of plants in metal uptake is important because it facilitates the approaches to improve plants for metal control, but the mechanisms are not well understood. It was reported that citric acid significantly facilitated Cd uptake by plant roots and improved the translocation from roots to shoots [18]. Our previous study also indicated that differences between rice cultivars in Cd accumulations were related to their differences in LMWOAs secretion by the roots [19]. But the differences among rice cultivars in root secretion of organic acids and the relationships with Pb uptake, translocation and the accumulation in rice grain were not reported.

Materials and methods

Soil preparation

      The soil for the study was fetched from an unpolluted paddy field. The soil was air-dried and sieved with a 2 mm screen, and tested the following properties: particle size, pH, Organic Matter (OM) content and cation exchange capacity (CEC). Pb concentration of the soil was determined with AAS after a digesting procedure with H2O2-HF-HNO3-HClO4. The soil texture is a sandy loam (sand : silt : clay = 53.6% : 26.2% : 20.2%), with pH 6.6, OM 26.9 g kg-1, CEC 12.9 cmol kg-1, and Pb content 35.2 mg kg-1.

      The dried and sieved soil was put into pots (diameter 18 cm, height 20 cm, four kilogram for each pot) for rice cultivation. Two soil Pb levels were designed, e.g. 500 and 1000 mg Pb kg-1 soil (moderate and heavy pollution). PbCl2 solution was added into the pot soils with prompt stirring to get the Pb levels. The soils without adding Pb served as control. The prepared pot soils were submerged in water (2-3 cm under water surface) for more than a month before the transplant of rice seedlings.

Experimental design

      Six rice cultivars differing in grain Pb accumulations were selected for this research, according to our previous studies [20]. The cultivars were Liangyoupeijiu (high Pb accumulator, abbr. C01), Shanyou 63 (high Pb accumulator, C02), CV6 (moderate Pb accumulator, C03), Yangdao 6 (moderate Pb accumulator, C04), Wuyunjing 7 (low Pb accumulator, C05) and Yu 44 (low Pb accumulator, C06). Rice seeds were submerged in water for 48 h, germinated for 30 h, and then the sprouted seeds were sowed into unpolluted soil. After 30 days’ growth, similar seedlings were selected and transplanted into the prepared pots (three seedlings for each pot). During the growth period of rice plants, the pot soils were submerged with water (2-3 cm under water surface). The pots were placed in the open air with a randomized arrangement and six replicates.

Determination of Pb concentrations in rice plants

      At the 40th day after seedling transplant (tillering stage), rice plants were sampled in three replicated pots for testing Pb concentrations in the roots and shoots. Grain samples were collected at maturity for Pb concentration testing. The samples were washed with tap water and deionized water, and oven-dried at 70°C to constant weights. The dry samples were ground with a grinder, and sieved with a 100-mesh screen. Pb concentrations of samples were tested with AAS after a digesting procedure with HNO3 -HClO4 [21]. Certified reference materials and reagent blanks were run synchronously for the control of testing quality.

Determination of LMWOAs in the soils

      At tillering stage of rice growth (the 40th day after seedling transplant), pot soils were sampled , and LMWOAs in the samples were extracted and purified with reference to the procedure reported by Baziramakenga et al [22]. The soil samples (about 15 g, wet weight) were extracted with 100 mM NaOH for 12 h, filtered through Whatman No. 42, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 min. In order to precipitate humic substances, the supernatants were acidified to pH 2.5 with 1M HCl. The mixtures were centrifuged at 15,000 g for 15 min after 16 h of standing. The supernatants were extracted for 3 times, with10 ml of ethyl acetate for 5 min each time. The extracts were evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator at 600 C. LMWOAs were obtained by re-dissolving the residue in 3 ml distilled water.

      It was reported that there were seven main kinds of LMWOAs excreted by crop roots, including formic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, oxalic acid and citric acid [23]. Therefore, the seven kinds of LMWOAs were determined with an ion chromatograph (Dionex Dx 500, Dionex Corp.) in the soil extracts. The instrument was equipped with a U6K injector, a GP40 pump and a CD20 conductivity detector and a ASRSULTRA anion micromembrane suppressor. Columns were purchased from Dionex Corp. The LMWOAs were separated with an IonPac AS-11ion-exchange column (4×250 mm), an IonPac AG-11guard column (4×50 mm) and an IonPac ATC-3 anion-trap column (9×24 mm). The organic acid standards were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company.

Statistical analysis

      Data were analyzed with the statistical package SPSS 16.0. The differences among the rice cultivars in Pb concentrations, Pb translocation factors (TFs), and soil LMWOAs concentrations were compared through one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s test at the level of p < 0.05. The relationships between LMWOAs concentrations in the soils and Pb concentrations in different parts of rice plants, and the TFs of Pb from roots to shoots were analyzed with Pearson correlations (linear model) at two significant levels of p < 0.05 and 0.01.

      TFs of Pb from root to shoot = Pb concentrations in the shoots / Pb concentrations in the roots.

Results

Variation among rice cultivars in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in the grain

      There were significant (P < 0.05) differences among six rice cultivars in plant Pb concentrations, but the magnitudes of variations differed with the parts of plants and soil Pb levels (Table 1).

table 1 Table 1

Table 1: Pb concentrations in different parts of different rice cultivars at tillering stage (mg kg-1)

      The variations in roots were 17.33-22.56% [(the value of the highest cultivar − the value of the lowest cultivar)/the value of the lowest cultivar × 100%] under different soil Pb levels. The variations in shoots were larger and increased with the rise of soil Pb levels, and they were 59.86%, 67.78% and 74.94% for the control, 500 and 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatments.

      The translocation factors (TFs) of Pb from roots to shoots also varied largely among rice cultivars (Table 2). The magnitudes of variations were also in the order: control (33.49%) < 500 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatment (38.46%) < 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatment (53.10%).

table 2 Table 2

Table 2: Translocation factors (TFs) of Pb from roots to shoots at tillering stage

      The variations among the rice cultivars in grain Pb concentrations were larger than those in roots and shoots Pb concentrations, and they were all higher than 100% (Table 3). The variations also increased with the rise of soil Pb levels, and they were 114.29%, 139.35% and 146.93% for the control, 500 and 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatments.

table 3 Table 3

Table 3: Pb concentrations in the grains of different rice cultivars at maturity (mg kg-1)

      Correlation analysis indicate that grain Pb concentrations correlated positively and significantly (P <0.05 or 0.01) with shoot Pb concentrations and the TFs of Pb from roots to shoots, but insignificantly (P > 0.05) with root Pb concentrations (Table 4).

table 4 Table 4

Table 4: Correlation coefficients between grain Pb concentrations and Pb uptake and distribution in rice plants

Variation among rice cultivars in organic acid concentrations in soils and the relationships with Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in the grain

      Six kinds of LMWOAs were detected in the pot soils of the six rice cultivars (propionic acid was not detected) (Table 5). The contents of the LMWOAs differed with rice cultivars, soil Pb levels and the kinds of LMWOAs.

table 5 Table 5

Table 5: LMWOAs concentrations in the soils of differences rice cultivars (μg g-1, DW)

      On the composition of the LMWOAs, formic acid and acetic acid were dominant, and they occupied 96-98% of the total contents of six LMWOAs. There were significant (P <0.05) variations among six rice cultivars in the contents of six LMWOAs and in total contents of the LMWOAs. The magnitudes of variations differed with the kinds of LMWOAs and soil Pb levels. The variations were only 15.62-38.37% [(the value of the highest cultivar − the value of the lowest cultivar)/the value of the lowest cultivar × 100%] for formic acid and acetic acid, but relatively large (30.41-80.91%) for other four kinds of LMWOAs.

      The magnitudes of variations among six rice cultivars in the contents of LMWOAs increased with the rise of soil Pb levels. The variations in the contents of six LMWOAs were 15.62- 45.45%, 24.77-61.85% and 34.92-80.91% for the control, 500 and 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatments, respectively. The variations in total contents of LMWOAs were 20.62%, 31.11% and 37.30% for the control, 500 and 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatments, respectively.

      With regard to the relationships between the contents of LMWOAs and Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in rice plants. The contents of six LMWOAs and the total contents of LMWOAs correlated positively and generally significantly (P <0.05 or 0.01) with shoot Pb concentrations (only one exceptional value) (table 6). The contents of LMWOAs correlated positively and mostly significantly (p <0.05 or 0.01) with TFs of Pb from roots to shoots (three exceptional values), and with grain Pb concentrations (four exceptional values). The correlations between the contents of LMWOAs and root Pb concentrations were also positive but mostly insignificant (p > 0.05).

table 6 Table 6

Table 6: Correlations between Pb uptake, translocation in plants and organic acids in soils (n = 6)

Discussion

      Due to drastically increased industrial operations and fast urban expansion, some soils in China were contaminated by heavy metals in varying degrees. According to a national soil pollution survey, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, lead, chromium and nickel were identified as the priority control metals due to their higher concentrations in soils or higher health risks posed to the public. Children and adult females were the relatively vulnerable populations for the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks, respectively. Metal pollution in the soils in southern provinces of China is relatively higher than that in other provinces [24].

      Earlier researches showed that the uptake and translocation of trace elements in plants vary greatly not only among plant species but also among cultivars of the same species [25,26]. However, limited information is available about the mechanisms of variations.

      As suggested by some reports, there are three transport processes that most likely mediate metal accumulation into plant shoots, and subsequently into the seeds: (1) uptake by roots, (2) xylem-loading-mediated translocation to shoots, and (3) further translocation to seeds via the phloem [27].

      Our present research showed that the variations among rice cultivars in Pb accumulations differed with plant parts and soil Pb levels. The magnitudes of the variations in different plant parts were in the order: grains > shoots > roots. The magnitudes of the variations under different soil Pb levels were in the order: 1000 mg kg-1 (heavily Pb-polluted soil) > 500 mg kg-1 (moderately Pb-polluted soil) > control (non-Pb-polluted soil). The differences among rice cultivars in TFs of Pb from roots to shoots were also in the order shown above. Therefore, the diversities between rice cultivars in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation would be aroused by soil Pb stress.

      In our present results, grain Pb concentrations correlated positively and significantly (P <0.05 or 0.01) with shoot Pb concentrations and the TFs of Pb from roots to shoots, and positively but insignificantly (P > 0.05) with root Pb concentrations. The results indicate that grain Pb accumulation depends somewhat on root uptake, and to a larger extent, depends upon the transport of Pb from root to aerial parts.

      It was assumed that the metals in soils and plants were likely bound to many kinds of ligands, such as organic acids, organic alkalis, proteins, etc [28]. But others thought that the association between the release of organic chelators from roots and the enhanced uptake and translocation of metals in plants was not proved by sufficient evidences [29].

      This study presents that there were significant differences among the rice cultivars in the concentrations of six kinds of LMWOAs and the total contents of the LMWOAs in the soils. The magnitudes of the differences generally matched the variations of root and shoot Pb concentrations, and were all in the order: 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatment > 500 mg kg-1 treatment > control. The rice cultivars reacted differently to soil Pb stress on LMWOAs secretion. Under 500 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatment (moderately polluted), the total contents of LMWOAs were significantly increased for high Pb-accumulating cultivars (such as Shanyou 63), compared to the control, but they were not changed for low Pb-accumulating cultivars (such as Yu 44). Under 1000 mg kg-1 soil Pb treatment (heavily polluted), the total LMWOAs contents were not significantly changed for high Pb-accumulating cultivars (such as Liangyoupeijiu and Shanyou 63), but they were significantly reduced for low Pb-accumulating cultivars (such as Wuyunjing 7 and Yu 44). The analyses on the relationships between the contents of LMWOAs and Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in rice plants indicated that there were close (positive and significant) correlations between LMWOAs contents in the soils and Pb concentrations in the shoots. The correlations between soil LMWOAs contents and TFs of Pb from roots to shoots, and grain Pb concentrations were also positive and generally significant. The correlations between soil LMWOAs contents and root Pb concentrations were positive but mostly insignificant (P > 0.05). The results suggest that LMWOAs in the soils promoted root Pb uptake, and to a larger extent, enhanced the translocation of Pb form root to shoot. The effects would further influence Pb transfer to and accumulation in rice grain.

      It was reported that a rapid root-to-shoot translocation and enhanced xylem loading capacity may be the crucial processes for high Zn density in rice grains [30]. In hydroponic conditions, application of citric acid alleviated Cd toxicity, and significantly increased Cd uptake and accumulation in the roots, stems and leaves of Brassica napus [31]. But in a phytoextraction experiment, the accumulation and total removal of Cd by shoots was not significantly changed by EDTA [32]. Uptake of Pb by plant roots may varies according to the type of chelators used. It was reported that EDTA was capable of dose-dependently increasing Pb uptake by Vicia faba roots, but citric acid was unable to enhance Pb accumulation by V. faba roots [33]. Therefore, the functions of different kinds of organic acids in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in rice plants need further investigation.

Conclusions

      Our present research indicates that Pb accumulation in rice grain depends somewhat on root uptake, and to a larger extent, depends upon the transport from root to aerial parts. The rice cultivars varying significantly in grain Pb accumulations also differed greatly in the secretion of LMWOAs, and the rice cultivars reacted differently to soil Pb stress in the secretion of LMWOAs. As a consequence, the magnitudes of the variations among the cultivars in LMWOAs secretions increased with the rise of soil Pb levels. There were close (positive and significant) correlations between the secretion of LMWOAs and Pb concentrations in the shoots and in the grains, and TFs of Pb from roots to shoots. The correlations between LMWOAs secretions and root Pb concentrations were positive but mostly insignificant (p > 0.05). The results suggest that LMWOAs promotes root Pb uptake, and to a larger extent, enhance the translocation of Pb form root to shoot. The effects would further influence Pb transfer to and accumulation in rice grain. In conclusion, the variations among rice cultivars in root LMWOAs secretions ought to be one of the main mechanisms that differentiate rice cultivars in Pb uptake, translocation and accumulation in rice grain.

-->

Acknowledgments

      This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31071350, 41541016).

References

  1. Gratao PL, Prasad MNV, Cardoso PF, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA. Phytoremediation: Green technology for the clean up of toxic metals in the environment. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005; 17: 53–64.
  2. Rajkumar M, Prasad MNV, Freitas H, Ae N. Biotechnological applications of serpentine bacteria for phytoremediation of heavy metals. Crit Rev Biotech. 2009; 29: 120–130.
  3. Yadav SK. Heavy metals toxicity in plants: An overview on the role of glutathione and phytochelatins in heavy metal stress tolerance of plants. S Afr J Bot. 2010; 76: 167–179.
  4. Duong TTT, Lee BK. Determining contamination level of heavy metals in road dust from busy traffic areas with different characteristics. J Environ Manage. 2011; 92: 554–562.
  5. Yang QW, Shu WS, Qiu JW, Wang HB, Lan CY. Lead in paddy soils and rice plants and its potential health risk around Lechang Lead/Zinc Mine, Guangdong, China. Environ Int. 2004; 30: 883– 889.
  6. Wei B, Yang L. A review of heavy metal contaminations in urban soils, urban road dusts and agricultural soils from China. Microchem J. 2010; 94: 99–107.
  7. Silbergeld EK, Waalkes M, Rice JM. Lead as a carcinogen: experimental evidence and mechanisms of action. Am J Ind Med. 2000; 38: 316–323.
  8. Zhuang P, McBride MB, Xia HP, Li NY, Li Z. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci Total Environ. 2009; 407: 1551–1561.
  9. Bhargava A, Gupta VK, Singh AK, Gaur R. Microbes for heavy metal remediation. In: Gaur R, Mehrotra S, Pandey RR (Eds) Microbial Applications. IK International Publ, New Delhi. 2012; 167–177.
  10. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G. Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land, A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2010; 8: 1–17.
  11. Liao YC, Chien SW,Wang MC, Shen Y, Hung PL, Das B. Effect of transpiration on Pb uptake by lettuce and on water soluble low molecular weight organic acids in rhizosphere. Chemosphere. 2006; 65: 343–351.
  12. Zorrig W, Rouached A, Shahzad Z, Abdelly C, Davidian J, Berthomieu P. Identification of three relationships linking cadmium accumulation to cadmium tolerance and zinc and citrate accumulation in lettuce. J Plant Physiol. 2010; 167: 1239–1247.
  13. Liu JG, Zhu QS, Zhang ZJ, Xu JK, Yang JC, Wong MH. Variations in Cd accumulation among rice cultivars and types and the selection of cultivars for reducing Cd in the diet. J Sci Food Agric. 2005; 85: 147–153.
  14. Grant CA, Clarke JM, Duguid S, Chaney RL. Selection and breeding of plant cultivars to minimize Cd accumulation. Sci Total Environ. 2007; 390: 301–310.
  15. Richau KH, Schat H. Intraspecific variation of Ni and Zn accumulation and tolerance in the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. Plant Soil. 2009; 314: 253–262.
  16. Kramer U. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010; 61: 517–534.
  17. Hanikenne M, Nouet C. Metal hyperaccumulation and hypertolerance: a model for plant evolutionary genomics. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011; 14: 252–259.
  18. Li HY, Liu YG, Zeng GM, Zhou L, Wang X, Wang YH, Wang CL, Hu XJ, Xu WH. Enhanced efficiency of cadmium removal by Boehmeria nivea (L.) Gaud. in the presence of exogenous citric and oxalic acids. J Environ Sci. 2014; 26: 2508–2516.
  19. Liu JG, Qian M, Cai GL, Zhu QS, Wong MH. Variations between rice cultivars in root secretion of organic acids and the relation with plant cadmium uptake. Environ Geochem Hlth. 2007; 29: 189–195.
  20. Liu JG, Li KQ, Xu JK, Zhang ZJ, Ma TB, Lu XL, Yang JC, Zhu QS. Lead toxicity, uptake and translocation in different rice cultivars. Plant Sci. 2003; 165: 793–802.
  21. Allen SE. Analysis of vegetation and other organic materials. In: Allen SE (ed) Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. 1989; 46–61.
  22. Baziramakenga R, Simard RR, Leroux GD. Determination of organic acids in soil extracts by ion chromatography. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995; 27: 349–356.
  23. Jones DL, Darrah PR, Kochian VL. Critical evaluation of organic acid mediated iron dissolution in the rhizosphere and its potential role in root iron uptake. Plant Soil. 1996; 180: 57–66.
  24. Chen HY, Teng YG, Lu SJ, Wang YY, Wang JS. Contamination features and health risk of soil heavy metals in China. Sci Total Environ. 2015; 512–513: 143–153.
  25. Stolt P, Asp H, Hultin S. Genetic variation in wheat cadmium accumulation on soils with different cadmium concentrations. J Agron Crop Sci. 2006; 192: 201–208.
  26. Guo XF, Wei ZB, Wu QT, Qiu JR, Zhou JL. Cadmium and zinc accumulation in maize grain as affected by cultivars and chemical fixation amendments. Pedosphere. 2011; 21: 650–656.
  27. Clemens S, Palmgren MG, Kramer U. A long way ahead: Understanding and engineering plant metal accumulation. Trends Plant Sci. 2002; 7: 309–315.
  28. Verbruggen N, Hermans C, Schat H. Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants. New Phytol. 2009; 181: 759–776.
  29. Do Nascimento CWA, Xing B. Phytoextraction: a review on enhanced metal availability and plant accumulation. Sci Agric. 2006; 63: 299–311.
  30. Wu CY, Feng Y, Shohag JI, Lu LL, Wei YY, Gao C, Yang XE. Characterization of 68Zn uptake, translocation, and accumulation into developing grains and young leaves of high Zn-density rice genotype. J Zhejiang Univ–Sci B (Biomed & Biotechnol). 2011; 12: 408–418.
  31. Ehsan S, Ali S, Noureen S, Mahmood K, Farid M, Ishaque W, Shakoor MB, Rizwan M Citric acid assisted phytoremediation of cadmium by Brassica napus L. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014; 106: 164–172.
  32. Wei JL, Lai HY, Chen ZS. Chelator effects on bioconcentration and translocation of cadmium by hyperaccumulators, Tagetes patula and Impatiens walleriana. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012; 84: 173–178.
  33. Shahid M, Pinelli E, Pourrut B, Silvestre J, Dumat C. Lead-induced genotoxicity to Vicia faba L. roots in relation with metal cell uptake and initial speciation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011; 74: 78– 84.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.