• Clinical Image
  • |
  • Open Access

Chlorhexidine contact vasculitis

  • Selma Benkirane*;
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Mounia Bennani;
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Zakia Douhi;
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Sara Elloud;
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Hanane Baybay;
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Fatima Zahra Mernissi
    • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco
  • Corresponding Author(s): : Selma Benkirane

  • Department of dermatology, university hospital hassan ii, fez, Morocco

  • : dr.benkiraneselma@gmail.com

  • +39-06-30157251

  • Benkirane S (2020).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Jun 22, 2020
Accepted : Mar 10, 2020
Published Online : Mar 13, 2020
Journal : Journal of Case Reports and Medical Images
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Benkirane S, Bennani M, Douhi Z, Elloudi S, Baybay H, Mernissi FZ. Chlorhexidine contact vasculitis. J Case Rep Clin Images. 2020; 3(1): 1039.

Clinical Image

Description

      Chlorhexidine contact vasculitis in a 72-year-old patient with cutaneous herpes (Figure 1) for whom he was put on local care with chlorhexidine, the evolution was marked by the installation of an erythematous and purpuric plaque at the level of the left flank (Figure 2) appeared 4 days after the application of chlorhexidine that the patient did not rinse with water after use. Dermoscopy showed an erythema that did not fade at the vitropression corresponding to purpura (Figure 3). The evolution was marked by the improvement and the regression of the plaque after application of dermocorticoids and eviction of the causal product (Figure 4).

Figure 1: Vesicles grouped in bouquets in favor of cutaneous herpes.

Figure 2: Erythematous and purpuric cupboard on the left flank

Figure 3: Dermoscopy showed an erythema that did not fade at the vitropression corresponding to purpura.

Figure 4: Control photo after 10 days.

      Contact vasculitis is rare, usually with cutaneous expression and easy to diagnose due to the topography of the lesions on the contact area. They can follow the application of chemicals (insecticides, petroleum derivatives), plants or animals or topical drugs (antiseptics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). It is classified among the vasculitis of small vessels, it appears 1 to 8 days after applications leading to purpuric or urticarial lesions, sometimes associated with eczematiform lesions. Contact dermatitis and irritant dermatitis are the main differential diagnoses. Early biopsies revealed lymphocytic and / or leukocytoclastic vasculitis of the superficial dermal vessels sometimes associated with epidermal spongiosis. Patch tests with the product in question reproduce the initial lesion. Treatment is essentially based on the eviction of the causative product associated with symptomatic treatment.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.