• Research Article
  • |
  • Open Access
  • |
  • ISSN: 2637-4501

Lessons Learned from the First 60 Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Prone Position

    • Norberto Daniel Velasco Hernández*;
      • Chief of General Surgery Clinic, Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital San Martin, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    • Santiago Bartolomé De Battista;
      • Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital San Martin, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    • María Micaela Zicavo;
      • Department of Medical Oncology of University Hospital San Martin, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    • Elian Maristany Bastida;
      • Department of Medical Oncology of University Hospital San Martin, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    • María Florencia Hernández
      • Department of Internal Medicine of Institute os Diagnostic of La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  • Corresponding Author(s): Norberto Daniel Velasco Hernández

  • Chief of General Surgery Clinic, Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital San Martin, St 8 N° 2877 Berisso, Buenos Aires Argentina

  • ndvelascohernandez@gmail.com

  • Norberto DVH (2020).

  • This Article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Received : Jun 10, 2020
Accepted : Jul 24, 2020
Published Online : Jul 30, 2020
Journal : Annals of Gastroenterology and the Digestive System
Publisher : MedDocs Publishers LLC
Online edition : http://meddocsonline.org

Cite this article: Norberto DVH, Santiago BDB, MaríaMZ, Elian MB, María FH. Lessons Learned from the First 60 Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Prone Position. Ann Gastroenterol Dig Sys. 2020; 3(1): 1021.

Keywords: Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Prone position; Complications.

Abstract

      Background: Since the initial description of laparoscopic fundoplication in 1991 for the treatment of gastroesopha- geal reflux disease, different minimally invasive procedures have been developed until nowadays, when esophagecto- my is performed using combined thoracoscopy and lapar- oscopy.

      Objective: The aim of our study is to analyse the intraop- erative complications of minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position.

      Material and methods: Between November 2011 and April 2020, 60 patients underwent minimally invasive es- ophagectomy in prone position in the Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos General San Martín and private practice of La Plata city.

      Results: During the abdominal stage one patient present- ed coronary vessel injury and other with short vessel injury. The complications occurring in the thoracic stage included lung injury, azygos arch injury, thoracic duct section, laryn- geal recurrent nerve lesion, main stem bronchus injury and pericardium lesion, during lymph node resection. Most of these complications occurred in the first 30 patients, while in the remaining 30 cases only two complications (p = 0.4)

      Conclusion: Minimally invasive esophagectomy in prone position is a feasible and safe procedure that can cause seri- ous intraoperative complications due to its complexity. Al- though the results of our series did not show statistically significant differences, the number of complications during surgeries performed by the same team showed an impor- tant reduction associated with better training.

Introduction

      Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer; however, it has been commonly associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Since the initial description of laparoscopic fundoplication in 1991 for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, different mini- mally invasive procedures have been developed for the man- agement of esophageal diseases. In this way, thoracoscopic staging was incorporated to avoid unnecessary thoracotomy in advanced tumors; later, video-assisted thoracoscopic proce- dures were developed until nowadays, when esophagectomy is performed using combined thoracoscopy and laparoscopy [1,2].

      Minimally invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) in Prone Position (PP) is a procedure during which the patient is placed in a prone position during the thoracoscopic approach. The first experi- ences were published by Cuschieri et al. in 1994 who described this approach to access the posterior mediastinum and the es- ophagus for mobilization and resection. The largest experience reported with MIE in PP was described by Palanivelu et al. in 2006. This publication provides a detailed description of the procedure and reports surprising results of low morbidity and mortality. This was the starting point for many surgeons to use this approach in candidates for esophagectomy [4,5].

      The aim of our study is to analyse the intraoperative compli- cations of MIE in PP during the first 60 procedures.

Methods

      Between November 2011 and May 2020, 60 patients under- went MIE in PP in the Hospital Interzonal General de Agudos General San Martin and private practice of La Plata. The charac- teristics of the patients and the type of esophageal disease are described in Table 1.

      All the procedures were performed by the same surgical team integrated by an experienced thoracic surgeon. The train- ing process was previously carried out in pigs in the Minimally Invasive Surgery Laboratory of the Faculty of Medicine of the National University of La Plata (UNLP).

      Thoracic stage: The patient is positioned in prone position, with both arms extended. Two devices are used to provide sup- port on the upper chest and pelvis for an adequate excursion of the diaphragm and ventilation. Three ports are introduced: A 10 mm port at the level of the tip of the scapula, a 5 mm trocar at the level of the 4th or 5th intercostal space, approximately 7 cm from the spine, and a 10 mm port for the left hand at the ninth intercostal space, 7 cm from the spine. Sometimes we use one more trocar to perform lymphadenectomy of the supracarinal space in cases of squamous carcinomas. Once the camera has been introduced, the thoracic vertebrae are visualized; the me- diastinal pleura is opened, the azygos arch is cut, followed by total mobilization of the esophagus and resection of the sub- carinal lymph nodes. We used selective intubation in the first 20 cases and then changed to normal intubation with 8 mm Hg carbon dioxide insufflation. We also changed the sequence of the procedure. The first step is the transection of the inferior pulmonary ligament. Then the mediastinum is opened imme- diately below the aorta with the aim of performing a complete mesoesophagus resection. Therefore, the esophagus is dissect- ed and pushed upwards behind the pericardium and alongside the inferior pulmonary vein up to the right main stem bronchus. The entire periesophageal lymph nodes are excised en bloc with  the specimen. The arch of the azygos vein is sectioned; the es- ophagus is dissected with the subcarinal lymph nodes and is continued to the borders of the trachea in case of squamous cell carcinoma.

      Abdominal stage: the patient is repositioned to the supine position. The surgeon takes place in between the legs, the first assistant on the right side of the patient, the second assistant on the left side of the patient. The procedure starts with the opening of the greater omentum and continues along the great- er curvature, preserving the right gastro-epiploic vessels that will provide irrigation to the gastroplasty. Lymph nodes from the celiac trunk are then dissected. After skeletonization of the stomach, the cervical esophagus is dissected and the specimen is removed through a mini supraumbilical midline laparotomy. At this level, the gastric conduit is constructed using mechanical stapler (hybrid technique). Then, the gastric conduit is pulled up through the mediastinum and an anastomosis is performed with the cervical esophagus (McKeown procedure) When a subtotal esophagectomy with anastomosis in the mediastinum is performed according to the Ivor-Lewis technique, the pro- cedure begins in the abdomen, the gastroplasty is made com- pletely through laparoscopy.

      Our digital file and videos were used for data collection, and we performed a bibliographic search in Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. The statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test. P values less than 0.05 were considered sta- tistically significant.

Results

      The procedure was successfully in most cases. One patient with a history of pneumonia with pleural effusion was convert- ed during the thoracic stage because the posterior mediastinum could not be accessed due to pleural and pulmonary adhesions. Another patient was converted during the abdominal stage due to multiple adhesions secondary to previous surgeries. Intraop- erative complications are summarized in Table 2.

      The two cases of lung injury were minor complications. Azy- gos arch injury was due to inappropriate manipulation of the vascular endostapler that was resolved using clips. The thoracic duct was inadvertently dissected, producing chylothorax with poor response to medical treatment. The patient required re- operation five days with clip insertion via thoracoscopy. The re- current laryngeal nerve injury was an unfortunate complication that produced permanent dysphonia in a 27-year-old female patient with a good oncological prognosis due to a stage T2 N0 carcinoma. Finally, the harmonic scalpel produced thermal dam- age of the left main stem bronchus during resection of the sub- carinal lymph nodes. Although it was a dramatic event, it could be solved by using a hermetically sealed 4-0 monofilament su- ture. This situation prolonged the patient’s stay at the intensive care unit, but, fortunately, no major inconveniences developed. Injury of the coronary and short vessels during resection of the abdominal lymph nodes was rapidly solved using clips and there was no need for conversion. Most of these complications oc- curred in the first 30 patients (group 1) whit six intraoperative complications, while only three complication occurred in the remaining 30 cases (group 2), lung injury produced by a trocar in a patient with pleuropulmonary adhesions and a small and a pericardial perforation that has not required any treatment. The third complication has been the case of haemorrhage due to injury to the short vessels during abdominal stage; Table 3.

      When comparing patients who received neoadjuvant ther- apy with those who underwent surgery directly, only three pa- tients in the neoadjuvant therapy group presented versus six patients with complications in the other group (p = 0.7). There were no mortality consequences for any of the complications mentioned and these complications were not associated with mortality in our series.

table 1 Table 1

Table 1: Characteristics of the patients and the type of esophageal disease.

table 2 Table 2

Table 2: Intraoperative complications.

table 3 Table 3

Table 3: Groups comparison.

Discussion

      There is enough evidence supporting the use of MIE due to less pulmonary complications while maintaining equal oncolog- ical long-term outcomes of open surgery [12-15].

      Prone position for the minimally invasive procedure has been proposed as an alternative to the lateral approach due to decreased pulmonary morbidity, better surgeon ergonomics and operative exposure, and higher lymph node yield due to better exposure of the sub-carinal space. The most important disadvantage is the difficulty generated by this position in case a rapid conversion is needed [16-18].

      As already mentioned, the advantages of MIE in the PP are remarkable. However, the procedure related complications may be serious; therefore, all possible care must be taken to avoid or at least minimize them. These complications can occur at the beginning of the thoracic stage, and include injury of the lungs, pleura or diaphragm, mainly in patients with previous surgeries or infections with pleural effusion. Esophageal mobilization may cause vascular injury of esophageal vessels, azygos vein, aorta, pericardium and left pulmonary vein which is hidden behind the esophagus. Complete or partial section of the thoracic duct has also been described, which is not detected during surgery, resulting in chylothorax and even serious malnutrition and fluid and electrolyte disorders. Airway injury, mainly in the carina or main stem bronchus, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury may occur during lymph node resection, particularly in patients with extended lymph node resection due to squamous cell carcinoma. During the thoracic stage, meticulous care must be taken during dissection and when using thermal devices to minimize the incidence of complications; if possible, devices with reduced thermal spread should be used. The abdominal stage is not ex- empt from the usual complications of laparoscopic surgery. The main complications of esophagectomy are associated with right gastroepiploic artery injury during gastric mobilization, a situ- ation that could compromise gastroplasty vascularization, and injury of the celiac trunk and branches during lymph node re- section [18-20].

      The learning curve of MIE in PP shows differences in the different publications. In our series, the number of complica- tions decreased after 30 procedures; however, this reduction was not statistically significant. This could be due to the small sample size. For some authors, the learning curve to reach a plateau ranges between 15 and 20 cases, while other authors who worked with systematized cumulative measurement sys- tems reported more than 35 or 40 cases [8,20-23].

Conclusion

      In conclusion, MIE in PP is a feasible and safe procedure, but it can cause serious intraoperative complications due to its complexity. Although with the results of our series they cannot be relevant conclusions, the number of complications during surgeries performed by the same team showed a reduction as- sociated with better training.

References

  1. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012; 379: 1887-1892.
  2. Differences in esophageal cancer surgery in terms of surgical approach and extent of lymphadenectomy: Findings. A. S. van Rijswijk. Ann Surg Onco. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07316-9
  3. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, Mc-Caughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003; 238: 486-494.
  4. Goldfarb M, Brower S, Schwaitzberg SD. Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24: 304-334.
  5. Cuschieri A. Thoracoscopic subtotal oesophagectomy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 1994; 2: 21-25.
  6. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position--experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 7-16.
  7. Koyanagi K, Ozawa S, Tachimori Y. Minimally invasive esophagectomy performed with the patient in a prone position: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2016; 46: 275-284.
  8. Dantoc MM, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 16: 486-494.
  9. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. 2017.
  10. Oshikiri T, Yasuda T, Yamamoto M, Kanaji S, Yamashita K, et al. Trainee competence in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position: evaluation using cumulative sum techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016; 401: 797-804.
  11. Li X, Lai FC, Qiu ML, Luo RG, Lin JB, Liao B. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: experience of 226 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Tech. 2016; 26: 60-65.
  12. Pirchi D, Cerutti R, Pankl L, Lyons G, Porto E. Esofagectomía subtotal por abordaje mini-invasivo. Rev Argent Cirug. 2013; 104: 6-8.
  13. Taioli E, Schwartz RM, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Moskowitz G, van Gerwen M, et al. Quality of life after open or minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer-A systematic review. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017.
  14. Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig García J, Bonavina, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: the TIME trial. Ann Surg. 2017; 266: 232-236.
  15. Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, Sun W. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016; 14: 304.
  16. Shen Y, Zhong M, Wu W, Wang H, Feng M, et al. The impact of tidal volume on pulmonary complications following minimally invasive esophagectomy: A randomized and controlled study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 146: 1267-1273.
  17. Eliza RC. Hagens, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwn, Miguel Cuesta, Suzzane S. Gisbertz. The extent of lymphadenectomy in Esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9: S713-S723.
  18. Akiyama Y, Iwaya T, Endo F, Nikai H, Sato K, et al. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy with total meso-esophageal escision reduce regional lymph node recurrence. Langenbeckcks Arch Surg. 2018; 403: 967-975.
  19. Ma H, Li Y, Ding Z, Liu X, Xu J, Qin J. The clinical significance of subcarinal lymph node dissection in the radical resection of oesophageal cancer. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2013; 16: 839-843.
  20. Pennathur A, Luketich J. Complication of minimally invasive esophagectomy. In: Little AG, Merrill WH. Complications in cardiothoracic surgery (Second edition). Dayton OH. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2010: 247-265.
  21. Tapias LF, Morse CR. Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: description of a learning curve. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 1130-1140.
  22. Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17: 515-519.
  23. Dhamija A, Rosen JE, Dhamija A, Gould Rothberg BE, Kim AW, et al. Learning curve to lymph node resection in minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Innovations (Phila). 2014; 9: 286-291.

MedDocs Publishers

We always work towards offering the best to you. For any queries, please feel free to get in touch with us. Also you may post your valuable feedback after reading our journals, ebooks and after visiting our conferences.